§14 Series
Our thorough treatment of sequences lets us obtain the basic properties of infinite series quickly.
Why this matters
An infinite sum is not something you can add up directly. Definition 14.2 turns it into a limit of ordinary finite sums, so every tool from §§7–12 applies at once. Series are also how many functions are actually computed: , and are all sums of power series (§23).
is shorthand for . For example,
is shorthand for , which we now give a meaning.
My notes(saved)
The partial sums of are . The series converges if converges to a real number , and then we define . Thus
A series that does not converge diverges. We write if , and similarly for . The symbol has no meaning otherwise. When the starting index does not matter we just write .
My notes(saved)
If all , the partial sums increase, so by Theorems 10.2 and 10.4, either converges or diverges to . In particular is always meaningful. converges absolutely if converges. Absolutely convergent series converge (Corollary 14.7).
Intuition
Keep two sequences apart: the terms and the partial sums . Convergence of a series is a statement about . Whether a series converges depends only on its tail: dropping or changing finitely many terms changes every later partial sum by the same fixed amount. The value of the sum, of course, depends on every term.
Try it: watch the partial sums
Section titled “Try it: watch the partial sums”Orange dots are the terms and blue dots the partial sums . Compare , whose terms go to but whose sums creep off to infinity, with .
A series is a geometric series, the easiest kind to sum. For ,
To verify this, multiply the left side by : . For , (Theorem 9.7(b)), so
If and , then does not tend to , so the series diverges by Corollary 14.5.
Formula (2) and the next fact are very important and should be used whenever possible, even though (1) is not proved until §15. For fixed ,
So for we can write . Exact values for are hard. Fourier series or complex variables give
Similar formulas hold for every even , but none is known for odd . Nobody knows a formula for , although it converges and can be approximated as closely as desired. It is often far easier to prove that a series converges than to find its value.
The Cauchy criterion
Section titled “The Cauchy criterion”A series satisfies the Cauchy criterion if its partial sums form a Cauchy sequence:
We lose nothing by requiring , and writing in place of , (1) is equivalent to
Since , this is
We usually use version (3).
My notes(saved)
Theorem 10.11 gives:
A series converges if and only if it satisfies the Cauchy criterion.
Used in Exercise 14.6, Exercise 14.9
My notes(saved)
If a series converges, then .
Used in Theorem 14.9, Exercise 14.7
My notes(saved)
Proof
Take in 14.3(3): for each there is such that implies .
∎The converse fails: .
Common pitfallterms tending to 0 proves nothing
Corollary 14.5 is a test for divergence only. If , the series diverges. If , you have learned nothing: diverges and converges, and both have terms tending to .
Convergence tests
Section titled “Convergence tests”Let be a series with for all .
- If converges and for all , then converges.
- If and for all , then .
My notes(saved)
Proof
(i) For , by the triangle inequality (Exercise 3.6(b)),
satisfies the Cauchy criterion, so by (1) so does , which therefore converges.
(ii) If and are the partial sums of and , then , and forces .
∎Common pitfallcompare in the right direction
To prove convergence, bound your terms above by a convergent series. To prove divergence, bound them below by a divergent one. The other two combinations prove nothing: knowing , where diverges, says nothing about .
Absolutely convergent series are convergent.
Used in Exercise 14.6
My notes(saved)
Proof
If converges, apply 14.6(i) with .
∎The proofs of this corollary and of the Alternating Series Theorem 15.3 use the completeness of .
The Ratio Test is popular because it is often easy to use. But it is less general than the Root Test, the Root Test is what determines the radius of convergence of a power series, and the Ratio Test is useless if some . To review and , see Definition 10.6, Theorems 10.7 and 11.8, and §12.
For and for , the ratio tends to in both cases. One series diverges and the other converges. What can a ratio test say when that limit is ?
Two series with the same ratio limit behave differently, so no rule based on that limit alone could settle the question when it equals .
A series of nonzero terms
- converges absolutely if ,
- diverges if .
- Otherwise and the test gives no information.
My notes(saved)
If exists, it equals both the lim sup and the lim inf, so the Ratio Test decides the question unless that limit is . The proof comes after the Root Test.
Let be a series and . The series
- converges absolutely if ,
- diverges if .
- Otherwise and the test gives no information.
My notes(saved)
Proof
(i) Choose with . By Definition 10.6 there is with , so for . The geometric series converges, so converges absolutely by comparison, and so does (Exercise 14.9).
(ii) If , then by Theorem 11.7 a subsequence of tends to , so for infinitely many . Then , and the series diverges by Corollary 14.5.
(iii) For both and , by Theorem 9.7(c). One diverges and the other converges, so decides nothing.
∎Proof of the Ratio Test
Let . By Theorem 12.2,
If then , and the Root Test gives convergence. If then , and the Root Test gives divergence. Part (iii) again follows from and .
∎Inequality (1) shows the Root Test is superior: whenever the Root Test gives no information (), neither does the Ratio Test. Example 8 below is a series the Ratio Test cannot handle but the Root Test can. Usually, though, the tests fail together:
Intuition
Both tests are comparisons with a geometric series. If eventually stays below some , then , and converges. The Ratio Test reaches the same comparison one step at a time.
Common pitfallratios below 1 are not enough
“ for every ” does not imply convergence. For the ratios are all less than , yet the series diverges. The ratios must stay below some fixed , which is what guarantees.
If the are nonzero and , then by Corollary 12.3, so neither the Ratio Test nor the Root Test gives information about .
There is no clear-cut strategy for choosing among Comparison, Ratio and Root (and the two tests of §15). If nothing in the form of suggests a test and the ratios are easy to compute, you may as well try the Ratio Test first.
is geometric: it is , so its sum is . It also converges by comparison with , which converges by the Ratio or Root Test (both limits are ). But none of these tests gives the exact value.
. With , , so Ratio and Root Tests give no information (Remark 14.10). Since we expect divergence, and indeed . Since diverges (its partial sums are a quarter of those of ), the series diverges by comparison.
. Ratio and Root Tests give no information, but and converges, so the series converges by comparison.
. Here , so the series converges by the Ratio Test. The Root Test works just as easily using .
with . The form suggests the Root Test: for even and for odd , so and the test fails, as does the Ratio Test. But an alert reader notices for even , so and the series diverges by Corollary 14.5.
. Since , it converges by comparison. Its real interest: for even and for odd , so and the Ratio Test gives no information. But for even and for odd , both tending to . So and the Root Test gives convergence.
. Ratio and Root Tests fail. Since diverges, 14.6(i) cannot prove convergence, and since the terms change sign, 14.6(ii) cannot prove divergence. The series in fact converges by the Alternating Series Test 15.3.
Reading alongside Abbott
Abbott introduces series in Section 2.4, where the Monotone Convergence Theorem settles and the harmonic series. There Abbott proves the Cauchy condensation test: for decreasing nonnegative terms, converges exactly when does. With the condensed series is geometric with ratio , which gives the result of §15 with no integrals at all. Section 2.7 has the Cauchy criterion, comparison, absolute convergence and alternating series. The Ratio Test appears there as an exercise, and the exact value of Example 2 is derived in Section 8.3.
Try it: which test works?
Section titled “Try it: which test works?”Pick a series and step through the four tests. Notice that no single test settles everything: the Ratio Test fails on the -series and on the oscillating series, the Root Test still works on the latter, and only the Alternating Series Test (Theorem 15.3) handles .
Practice: fill in the gaps
Section titled “Practice: fill in the gaps”The proof of part (i) of the Ratio Test (Theorem 14.8): trap the terms under a geometric series.
Fill in the gaps: Ratio Test, part (i) (Theorem 14.8)
This is the skeleton of the proof. In each gap choose the option that makes the argument work, then check.
- Let and pick a number with .
- Since , there is such that for all .
- Multiplying these inequalities, for we get .
- The geometric series converges because . By , converges, so converges absolutely.
Practice: spot the error
Section titled “Practice: spot the error”Two arguments, each with one line that claims more than the test allows.
Spot the error: the harmonic series
One line of this argument is wrong. Press the button on the line you think is the mistake.
- Let . For every , .
- By the Ratio Test, a series whose ratios are always less than converges.The Ratio Test (Theorem 14.8) asks for the lim sup of the ratios to be below 1, not for each ratio to be. Here the ratios tend to 1, so lim sup = 1 and the test gives no information. In fact ∑ 1/n diverges.
- So converges.
This is a standard pitfall. See Common mistakes: Ratios less than 1, or tending to 1.
Spot the error: comparing with the harmonic series
One line of this argument is wrong. Press the button on the line you think is the mistake.
- For every , .
- The series diverges.
- By the Comparison Test, diverges.Comparison proves divergence only from below: the terms must be at least those of a divergent series. Here they are smaller, which proves nothing. In fact ∑ 1/(n² + n) = ∑ (1/n − 1/(n+1)) telescopes to 1.
This is a standard pitfall. See Common mistakes: Comparing in the wrong direction.
Check your understanding
Section titled “Check your understanding”Take the quiz (3 questions)
If , must converge?
Corollary 14.5 says a convergent series has terms tending to . The converse is false.
What does the Ratio Test say about ?
, so this is case (iii) of Theorem 14.8. The series does converge, but you need another test, such as comparison or the integral test in §15.
What is ?
A geometric series with sums to .
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Determine which of the following series converge. Justify your answers.
Solution
(a) converges (ratio ) (b) converges (ratio ) (c) converges (ratio ) (d) diverges (terms ) (e) converges (compare with ) (f) diverges ()
Used in Exercise 14.2, Exercise 14.3, Exercise 14.4
My attempt(saved)
Repeat Exercise 14.1 for the following.
Solution
(a) diverges ( for ) (b) diverges (terms don’t tend to ) (c) converges () (d)–(g) converge (ratio or root test)
My attempt(saved)
Repeat Exercise 14.1 for the following.
Solution
(a) converges (ratio ) (b) converges () (c) converges () (d) converges (e) diverges (terms don’t tend to ) (f) converges (ratio )
My attempt(saved)
Repeat Exercise 14.1 for the following.
Solution
(a) converges () (b) diverges (it telescopes: ) (c) converges (ratio )
My attempt(saved)
Suppose and with real. Use limit theorems from §9 to quickly prove:
- .
- for .
- Is a reasonable conjecture? Discuss.
Solution
(c) No. For (), but .
Used in Exercise 14.6, Exercise 14.8, Exercise 16.3
My attempt(saved)
- Prove that if converges and is bounded, then converges.
- Observe that Corollary 14.7 is a special case of part (a).
Hint
Use Theorem 14.4, or compare .
Solution
- Choose with for all . Then . The series converges (it is times a convergent series, Exercise 14.5(b)), so converges by the Comparison Test 14.6(i) (with in the role of the dominating series).
- Take for all : if converges then converges, which is Corollary 14.7.
My attempt(saved)
Prove that if is a convergent series of nonnegative numbers and , then converges.
Hint
, so eventually, and then .
Solution
Since converges, (Corollary 14.5), so there is with for . For such , because and . By the Comparison Test, converges, and so does (adding finitely many terms does not affect convergence, Exercise 14.9).
Used in Exercise 15.6
My attempt(saved)
Show that if and are convergent series of nonnegative numbers, then converges.
Hint
for all .
Solution
Since , we get . The series converges by Exercise 14.5(a), so converges by the Comparison Test.
My attempt(saved)
The convergence of a series does not depend on any finite number of its terms, though its value does. Precisely: if is finite, then and both converge or both diverge. Prove this.
Hint
This is almost obvious from Theorem 14.4: beyond the last index where they differ, the sums in 14.3(3) are identical.
Solution
Let and be the partial sums of and , and choose larger than every index at which . For we have . Hence, for any , the Cauchy condition 14.3(3) for holds with some if and only if it holds for with the same . By Theorem 14.4 the two series converge or diverge together. (When they converge, is constant for , so the sums differ by that constant, which is why the value, unlike convergence, depends on the early terms.)
Used in Theorem 14.9, Exercise 14.7
My attempt(saved)
Find a series that diverges by the Root Test but for which the Ratio Test gives no information. Compare Example 8.
Solution
: the ratios alternate between and , but .
My attempt(saved)
Let be a sequence of nonzero reals such that the ratios form a constant sequence. Show is a geometric series.
Solution
Let be the common value of , so for all . By induction (true for , and ). So , a geometric series with first term and ratio .
My attempt(saved)
Let be a sequence with . Prove there is a subsequence such that converges.
Hint
Choose increasing with , which is possible by Theorem 11.7 or 11.2.
Solution
Since , Theorem 11.7 gives a subsequence with . Choose indices inductively: given , pick with and (possible because and ), and let . Then and . Since converges, the Comparison Test shows converges.
My attempt(saved)
It is often much harder to find the value of an infinite sum than to show it exists. Here are some sums that can be handled.
- Calculate and .
- Prove . (Note .)
- Prove . (Note .)
- Use (c) to calculate .
Solution
(a) and . (b) The partial sums telescope to . (c) They telescope to . (d) , so the sum is .
My attempt(saved)
Prove diverges by comparing with , where
has copies of .
Hint
, and each block of terms adds up to .
Solution
The th block of consists of the terms , in positions . For these we have , so . Each block has sum , so The partial sums of are increasing and unbounded, so , and by the Comparison Test . Hence diverges.
Used in §15