§5 The Symbols +∞ and −∞
The symbols and are extremely useful even though they are not real numbers. We often write simply as .
We adjoin and to and agree that for all . This ordering satisfies O1, O2 and O3 of §3. But we give no algebraic structure. Never apply a theorem or exercise stated for real numbers to the symbols .
Why this matters
The symbols are bookkeeping, not new numbers. They let us state results without a list of special cases: “every nonempty set has a supremum” (this section) and “every monotone sequence has a limit” (Corollary 10.5) are only true once are allowed as answers.
Unbounded intervals
Section titled “Unbounded intervals”For :
We sometimes write for . and are closed (unbounded) intervals, and and are open (unbounded) intervals.
sup and inf of any nonempty set
Section titled “sup and inf of any nonempty set”If is bounded above, is a real number by the Completeness Axiom 4.4. If is bounded below, is a real number by Corollary 4.5. We now define
Intuition
“” is just shorthand for a statement about real numbers: for every real there is with . Whenever a proof involves , unpack it into this form.
Let be any nonempty subset of . The symbols and always make sense. If is bounded above, is a real number; otherwise . If is bounded below, is a real number; otherwise . Moreover, .
For nonempty bounded , Exercise 4.14 says
We verify that the first equality holds even if or is unbounded. Exercise 5.7 asks you to do the same for the second.
Verification
If , then with , , so . Thus is an upper bound for , and .
For the reverse inequality, note that neither supremum is (the sets are nonempty), so the undefined sum cannot occur. If , then one of them, say , is . Pick . Then .
Otherwise is finite. Let . There are and with and . Then , so . Since is arbitrary, .
∎Common pitfallforms that have no value
Expressions such as , and are left undefined on purpose, because no single value would be right. For instance and , yet , and . Each of these is “”. The proof above is careful to rule out the sum before it can arise.
Reading alongside Abbott
Abbott has no section corresponding to this one and treats informally. Ross’s conventions here are what make later statements such as Theorem 11.8 true for every sequence, bounded or not.
The exercises below tie up loose ends, mostly by extending results of §4 to sets that need not be bounded.
Check your understanding
Section titled “Check your understanding”Take the quiz (3 questions)
What is ?
The set is not bounded above, so by the convention of this section . It is a symbol, not a real number.
For a nonempty set , which is always true?
Any has . Equality holds when is a single point, and when is unbounded above.
Let for nonempty . Which identity holds?
Negation reverses order, so it turns lower bounds of into upper bounds of . This also holds with the conventions for .
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Write the following sets in interval notation:
Solution
Used in Exercise 5.2
My attempt(saved)
Give the infimum and supremum of each set listed in Exercise 5.1.
Solution
(a) , (b) , (c) , (d) ,
My attempt(saved)
Give the infimum and supremum of each unbounded set listed in Exercise 4.1.
Solution
(h) , (k) , (l) , (o) , (t) , (u) ,
My attempt(saved)
Let be a nonempty subset of , and let . Prove .
Hint
For the case , simply state that this was proved in Exercise 4.9. If , then is not bounded below, so is not bounded above.
Solution
We use the conventions and .
If is bounded below, then is nonempty and bounded above, is a real number, and by Exercise 4.9.
If is not bounded below, then . Then is not bounded above (an upper bound of would make a lower bound of ), so and .
Used in Exercise 5.7, Exercise 11.8
My attempt(saved)
Prove for every nonempty subset of . Compare Exercise 4.6(a).
Hint
Pick . In every case in the extended order.
Solution
Pick . Since is a lower bound of and is an upper bound (this is also true when the value is ), in the extended order, so .
Used in Exercise 5.6
My attempt(saved)
Let and be nonempty subsets of with . Prove . Compare Exercise 4.7(a).
Hint
If there is nothing to prove on the right. Otherwise , and hence , is bounded above, and Exercise 4.7(a) applies. Treat the left side the same way.
Solution
Every upper bound of (in or ) is an upper bound of , so : if this is trivial, and otherwise and hence is bounded above, and is an upper bound of , so (Exercise 4.7(a)). In the same way every lower bound of is a lower bound of , so . Exercise 5.5 gives the middle inequality .
My attempt(saved)
Finish Example 1 by verifying the equality involving infimums.
Hint
Apply the supremum result to and , using and Exercise 5.4.
Solution
Let be nonempty subsets of . A nonempty set never has infimum , so is defined (it is if either term is). Since , Exercise 5.4 and the supremum result of this example give where the last two steps use in the extended reals (neither term is ) and Exercise 5.4 again.