§1 The Set ℕ of Natural Numbers
We write for the set of positive integers. Every has a successor, . The following properties of probably look obvious, at least the first four.
Why this matters
Analysis is full of statements indexed by : “the th term is at most ”, “the first terms are increasing”. Induction is how we prove infinitely many such statements with a finite argument. It comes back constantly: in the inequality behind Theorem 9.7, in sequences defined recursively (§10, Example 2), and in the step-by-step construction of subsequences (§11).
- N1. belongs to .
- N2. If belongs to , then its successor belongs to .
- N3. is not the successor of any element of .
- N4. If and in have the same successor, then .
- N5. A subset of that contains , and contains whenever it contains , must equal .
Most familiar properties of can be proved from these five axioms. The only one that is not obvious is N5, so it is worth seeing what it says.
Suppose satisfies the hypotheses of N5. Then , so , so , and so on. This “and so on” can never be completed by finitely many steps of reasoning. N5 is exactly the axiom that lets us conclude anyway.
Another way to see it: if N5 failed, there would be a set with (i) and (ii) , yet . Let be the smallest element of not in . Then by (i), so , and by minimality. By (ii), , which is a contradiction. This is persuasive but it is not a proof of N5, because it quietly assumes that every nonempty subset of has a least element and that every is a successor.
Mathematical induction
Section titled “Mathematical induction”Axiom N5 is the basis of mathematical induction. Let be a list of statements. All of them are true provided
is the basis for induction and is the induction step. A proof by induction must check both.
Prove for all positive integers .
Solution
Let be the statement “.” For example, says . says , which is true. That is the basis.
For the induction step, suppose is true. Adding to both sides,
which is . By induction, holds for all .
∎Notice that before the final sentence we never proved “ is true.” We proved an implication, “if then ,” which stands for infinitely many implications: , , and so on. Induction then strings them together. Also, formulas like this one are much easier to prove than to discover. Finding them often takes trial and error.
Intuition
Think of the induction step as one argument about an unspecified : a machine that takes a proof of and turns it into a proof of . The basis gets the machine started, and N5 says that running it forever reaches every natural number. A good self-check: does your induction step use anything about other than “ is true” and “”? If it quietly uses, say, , then the step has not been proved for .
All numbers of the form are divisible by .
Solution
Let be “ is divisible by .” is true because . For the induction step, the trick is to write
If , then , a multiple of . So , and induction finishes the proof.
∎Show for all and all real .
Solution
Let be “ for all real .” is clear. Assume . By the addition formula and the Triangle Inequality (§3),
using . By this is at most , which is .
∎Common pitfalla step that breaks at the bottom
Here is a flawed “proof” that in every group of people, all have the same birthday. The basis is true. For the step, take people. Send one person, , out of the room: the who remain share a birthday by . Bring back and send out someone else, : again the who remain share a birthday. The two groups overlap, so all share a birthday.
The step fails when . With two people, the two groups are and , and they do not overlap. One broken link ruins the whole chain, so always check that the step works for the smallest it will be used for.
Common pitfallstarting somewhere else
Induction can start at any integer : prove , and prove for every . The conclusion is then “ for all ”, and nothing is claimed below . For example, is false for but true for all . The step works only once is large enough (from you need , true for ), so the basis must be . Try both bases in the widget below.
Try it: build the chain
Section titled “Try it: build the chain”Pick a statement, check the basis, then apply the induction step to extend the chain of proved statements. The last three statements show what goes wrong when one of or is missing. For , try the bases and .
Reading alongside Abbott
Abbott treats induction in Section 1.2 as one of a few basic proof techniques, stated directly for subsets of , which is exactly axiom N5. Abbott does not list the Peano axioms; it takes as known and spends its effort on and . The principle, and how you use it, are the same in both books.
Check your understanding
Section titled “Check your understanding”Take the quiz (3 questions)
To prove a statement for every by induction, what must you show?
Induction needs the basis and the inductive step . Checking finitely many cases proves nothing about the rest; the Peano axiom N5 is what makes the two steps enough.
In the inductive step for , you assume the formula for . What do you add to both sides?
Adding gives , which is the formula for .
Let be the statement “ is odd”. If holds, then is odd too, so implies . What can you conclude?
The inductive step is valid, but is even, so the basis fails. Without the basis, the inductive step proves nothing.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Prove for all positive integers .
Hint
In the induction step, add to both sides and factor out .
Solution
: . Assuming , , which is .
My attempt(saved)
Prove for all positive integers .
Solution
: . Assuming , adding the next term gives .
My attempt(saved)
Prove for all positive integers .
Hint
By Example 1 the right side is . Prove by induction.
Solution
.
My attempt(saved)
- Guess a formula for by evaluating the sum for .
- Prove your formula using mathematical induction.
Solution
(a) The sums are , suggesting . (b) .
My attempt(saved)
Prove for all positive integers .
Solution
: . Then .
My attempt(saved)
Prove is divisible by when is a positive integer.
Hint
Write .
Solution
Induct on . For , . Suppose . Then Both terms are divisible by , so .
My attempt(saved)
Prove is divisible by for all positive integers .
Hint
Mimic Example 2: .
Solution
Induct on . For , , which is divisible by . Suppose . Then which is divisible by .
My attempt(saved)
The principle of induction extends as follows: are all true provided (i) is true and (ii) is true whenever is true and .
- Prove for all integers .
- Prove for all integers .
Solution
(a) . If then .
(b) . If then , the last step because by (a).
My attempt(saved)
- Decide for which integers the inequality is true.
- Prove your claim in (a) by mathematical induction.
Solution
(a) It holds for and for all , and fails for .
(b) Basis : . If with , then , since when .
My attempt(saved)
Prove for all positive integers .
Hint
Going from to , the sum loses its first term and gains the two terms and .
Solution
.
My attempt(saved)
For each , let denote the assertion “ is an even integer.”
- Prove is true whenever is true.
- For which is actually true? What is the moral of this exercise?
Solution
(a) , and is even.
(b) Never: is always even, so is always odd. The moral is that the induction step alone proves nothing. You must also check the basis.
My attempt(saved)
For let , let , and define for . The binomial theorem asserts
- Verify the binomial theorem for .
- Show for .
- Prove the binomial theorem using mathematical induction and part (b).
Hint
For (c), write , expand using , and collect the coefficient of . It is .
Solution
(b) Over the common denominator : .
Used in Theorem 9.7